ZilSwap Review: Deep Dive into the Zilliqa DEX

By Robert Stukes    On 13 Nov, 2024    Comments (24)

ZilSwap Review: Deep Dive into the Zilliqa DEX

ZilSwap Fee Calculator

Trade Cost Comparison Calculator

Estimate your trading costs on ZilSwap versus other major DEXs based on transaction size and network conditions.

Fee Comparison Table
DEX Swap Fee Avg. Gas Cost (USD) Total Estimated Cost
ZilSwap 0.30% $0.001 $0.301
Uniswap 0.30% $1.50 $1.80
PancakeSwap 0.25% $0.30 $0.55

Key Takeaways

  • ZilSwap is the leading DEX for Zilliqa‑based tokens, using an AMM model with a 0.3% fee.
  • Built on Zilliqa’s sharded architecture, trades settle in seconds with very low gas costs.
  • Liquidity providers earn a share of fees and can stake ZIL for additional rewards.
  • Smart contracts are audited and written in Scilla, giving a strong security baseline.
  • Limited to the Zilliqa ecosystem, so it lacks cross‑chain assets found on Uniswap or PancakeSwap.

ZilSwap is a fully decentralized exchange (DEX) that operates exclusively on the Zilliqa blockchain. Designed for swapping ZRC-2 tokens, ZilSwap uses an autonomous market maker (AMM) model based on the constant product formula (x*y=k). In plain terms, you trade directly against liquidity pools, not against another trader, which eliminates waiting times and counter‑party risk.

How ZilSwap Works

The heart of the platform is its AMM engine. The constant product formula ensures that the product of the two token reserves stays constant, automatically adjusting prices as you trade. This mechanism, first popularised by Vitalik Buterin, provides continuous liquidity even for less‑traded ZRC-2 pairs.

Because Zilliqa employs sharding, the network can process thousands of transactions per second. That means swaps on ZilSwap settle almost instantly and cost only a fraction of a cent in gas fees. For users, the experience feels like a fast, cheap swap on a centralized platform, but without any KYC or custodial risk.

Supported Tokens and Wallet Integration

ZilSwap natively supports the ZRC-2 fungible token standard and, increasingly, the ZRC-6 NFT standard. The most common pairings involve the native ZIL token and a variety of project tokens built on Zilliqa.

To start swapping, you need a compatible wallet. The platform’s primary recommendation is ZilPay Wallet, which offers seamless Zilliqa‑specific functionality. MetaMask also works via a custom RPC endpoint, giving users already familiar with Ethereum tools a quick entry point.

Fees, Liquidity Incentives, and Governance

Every trade on the exchange incurs a flat 0.3% fee, which is automatically deposited into the corresponding liquidity pool. Liquidity providers (LPs) earn a proportional share of that fee, creating a passive income stream. In addition, ZilSwap offers farming rewards: LP tokens can be staked to receive extra ZIL or platform‑specific tokens, boosting overall yields.

Governance is handled through on‑chain voting. Holders of the platform’s governance token (if deployed) can propose fee adjustments, new pool listings, or parameter changes. While still early, this model promises community‑driven evolution.

Security, Audits, and Smart‑Contract Design

Security, Audits, and Smart‑Contract Design

All core contracts are written in Scilla, Zilliqa’s formally verifiable smart‑contract language. Scilla’s emphasis on safety reduces the attack surface compared with Solidity‑based contracts. Independent auditors have reviewed the code, and the audit reports are publicly accessible via the platform’s documentation hub.

At present, no major exploits have been reported, and the platform benefits from Zilliqa’s low‑level security architecture, including runtime checks against overflow and re‑entrancy.

Comparison with Other DEXs

ZilSwap vs. Multi‑Chain DEXs (2025 snapshot)
Feature ZilSwap Uniswap (Ethereum) PancakeSwap (BNB Chain)
Primary Network Zilliqa (sharded) Ethereum (EVM) BNB Chain (EVM)
Supported Token Standards ZRC‑2, ZRC‑6 ERC‑20, ERC‑721 BEP‑20, BEP‑721
Average Swap Fee 0.30% 0.30% (plus gas) 0.25% (plus gas)
Typical Gas Cost (USD) ≈ $0.001 ≈ $1.50 ≈ $0.30
Liquidity Depth (ZRC‑2 pools) Medium‑High (dominant for Zilliqa assets) High (global) High (global)
Cross‑Chain Capability None (Zilliqa‑only) Bridges available Bridges available

In short, ZilSwap shines when you need fast, cheap trades of Zilliqa‑based tokens. If you’re looking for a broad, cross‑chain market, Uniswap or PancakeSwap may feel more comfortable.

User Experience, Support, and Education

The web UI is clean and mirrors the familiar layout of major DEXs: a simple swap pane, a liquidity‑add section, and a dashboard showing pool stats. New users can follow step‑by‑step guides directly on the site or watch tutorial videos such as Ron Tester’s February 2025 review, which walks through wallet connection, token approval, and slippage settings.

Customer support is available 24/7 via live chat, email, and a community Discord channel. The platform also offers webinars, live training sessions, and a comprehensive documentation portal that explains concepts like impermanent loss, slippage tolerance, and gas optimization.

Market Outlook and Future Developments

ZilSwap’s fortunes are tightly coupled with the growth of the Zilliqa ecosystem. Analysts project ZIL’s price to hover between $0.013 and $0.026 throughout 2025, with upside potential if projects like Metapolis gain traction. Increased adoption would drive higher trading volume and deeper liquidity pools on ZilSwap.

Future roadmap items include:

  • Potential cross‑chain bridges that keep the core DEX on Zilliqa while allowing external assets.
  • Expanded governance token utilities, enabling LPs to vote on fee splits.
  • Enhanced UI features such as limit orders and advanced charting.

If Zilliqa continues to deliver high TPS and low fees, ZilSwap is well‑positioned to remain the go‑to DEX for ZRC‑2 traders.

Bottom Line

For anyone invested in the Zilliqa ecosystem, ZilSwap offers a fast, low‑cost, and secure way to trade native tokens. Its AMM design, audited Scilla contracts, and generous LP incentives make it a solid choice. The main drawback is its single‑chain focus, which limits exposure to assets outside Zilliqa. As long as you’re comfortable staying within that universe, the platform delivers a ZilSwap review experience that rivals larger DEXs in speed and price.

Frequently Asked Questions

Frequently Asked Questions

Do I need to complete KYC to use ZilSwap?

No. ZilSwap is a decentralized exchange, so you only need a compatible wallet. There are no identity checks or custodial steps.

What wallets are supported?

The primary wallet is ZilPay. MetaMask works through a custom RPC, and other Zilliqa‑compatible wallets such as GemWallet and Zeeves are also listed.

How are fees distributed?

The 0.3% swap fee is added to the pool’s reserves. LPs automatically earn a share proportional to their contribution each time a trade occurs.

Is ZilSwap secure?

Contracts are written in Scilla, audited by third‑party firms, and have no known major exploits as of October2025.

Can I trade non‑ZRC‑2 tokens on ZilSwap?

No. ZilSwap only supports Zilliqa standards (ZRC‑2 for fungible tokens and ZRC‑6 for NFTs). For other chains you’d need a multi‑chain DEX.

24 Comments

  • Image placeholder

    bob newman

    November 13, 2024 AT 11:45

    So you finally decided to look at ZilSwap, huh?
    Let me guess, you were dazzled by the glossy UI and the promise of ‘near‑zero’ gas.
    Well, welcome to the world where every transaction is secretly funded by a shadowy cabal of validators.
    The 0.30% fee looks innocent until you realize it’s padded by micro‑transactions that never make it to the dashboard.
    And that $0.001 gas cost? Sure, if you ignore the fact that it’s calculated on a stale block height.
    In reality, the network throttles your trade and sneaks an extra 0.1% into the smart contract.
    Did I mention the hidden liquidity tax that only appears when the pool depth falls below a mysterious threshold?
    The developers claim transparency, yet the code is obfuscated enough to make a cryptographer cry.
    If you think Uniswap’s $1.50 gas is high, wait until ZilSwap’s dynamic fees kick in during peak usage.
    It’s like paying for a premium coffee and discovering the beans were recycled.
    The fee calculator on the site is a masterpiece of deception, showing only the baseline numbers.
    Every time you click ‘Calculate’, a tiny portion of your data is sent to an undisclosed analytics server.
    Don’t be fooled by the tiny green success box; it’s just a psychological trick.
    You’ll notice the total cost rising by a few cents, and before you know it, you’ve paid more than you intended.
    Meanwhile, the core team quietly pumps ZRC‑2 tokens into the pool for their own profit.
    So, enjoy the ride, but keep your eyes peeled for the next hidden charge.

  • Image placeholder

    Anil Paudyal

    November 15, 2024 AT 08:37

    Cool calc, but i think u missed something.

  • Image placeholder

    Kimberly Gilliam

    November 17, 2024 AT 05:29

    OMG the fees are a nightmare! This is just too much.

  • Image placeholder

    Jeannie Conforti

    November 19, 2024 AT 02:22

    Yeah its actually pretty straightforward once u look at the numbers

  • Image placeholder

    tim nelson

    November 20, 2024 AT 23:14

    I get why people are hesitant, the gas costs can feel overwhelming.

  • Image placeholder

    Zack Mast

    November 22, 2024 AT 20:06

    In the grand tapestry of blockchain, swaps are but fleeting whispers.

  • Image placeholder

    Dale Breithaupt

    November 24, 2024 AT 16:58

    The ZilSwap fee is 0.30% plus negligible gas.

  • Image placeholder

    Rasean Bryant

    November 26, 2024 AT 13:50

    Looks like a solid option for low‑cost trades!

  • Image placeholder

    Angie Food

    November 28, 2024 AT 10:42

    Sure, but it’s just another overhyped DEX, nothing new.

  • Image placeholder

    Jonathan Tsilimos

    November 30, 2024 AT 07:35

    From a liquidity provision standpoint, ZilSwap exhibits a comparatively efficient fee structure relative to its peers, notwithstanding variance in network throughput.

  • Image placeholder

    jeffrey najar

    December 2, 2024 AT 04:27

    Exactly, the efficient fee structure can incentivize deeper liquidity pools.

  • Image placeholder

    Rochelle Gamauf

    December 4, 2024 AT 01:19

    One must critically assess the underlying tokenomics before allocating capital.

  • Image placeholder

    Jerry Cassandro

    December 5, 2024 AT 22:11

    Check the calculator on the site, it shows the exact numbers for any trade size.

  • Image placeholder

    Parker DeWitt

    December 7, 2024 AT 19:03

    👍🏼 Love the simplicity! 😎

  • Image placeholder

    Allie Smith

    December 9, 2024 AT 15:55

    Every new DEX is a step towards decentralizing finance, and ZilSwap is a noteworthy stride.

  • Image placeholder

    Lexie Ludens

    December 11, 2024 AT 12:48

    Ugh, same old story, high fees hidden in the fine print...

  • Image placeholder

    Aaron Casey

    December 13, 2024 AT 09:40

    For users coming from other chains, ZilSwap's low gas is a welcome bridge.

  • Image placeholder

    Leah Whitney

    December 15, 2024 AT 06:32

    Totally, especially for newcomers transitioning from Ethereum.

  • Image placeholder

    Lisa Stark

    December 17, 2024 AT 03:24

    Liquidity is the lifeblood of any exchange; without it, even the lowest fees mean little.

  • Image placeholder

    Logan Cates

    December 19, 2024 AT 00:16

    They probably hide extra costs in the smart contract, you never know.

  • Image placeholder

    Shelley Arenson

    December 20, 2024 AT 21:08

    🤔 Could be, but the UI looks clean.

  • Image placeholder

    Joel Poncz

    December 22, 2024 AT 18:01

    I feel u, the hidden stuff can be scary.

  • Image placeholder

    Kris Roberts

    December 24, 2024 AT 14:53

    Let’s talk about the impact of fee structures on user behavior, it’s fascinating!

  • Image placeholder

    lalit g

    December 26, 2024 AT 11:45

    Overall, ZilSwap presents a decent alternative, but users should compare across platforms.

Write a comment