Monetary Authority of Singapore Crypto Oversight: Strict Rules, Few Licenses, No Grace Period

By Robert Stukes    On 16 Nov, 2025    Comments (15)

Monetary Authority of Singapore Crypto Oversight: Strict Rules, Few Licenses, No Grace Period

MAS Compliance Cost Calculator

MAS Compliance Requirements

This calculator helps you estimate the annual costs of complying with Singapore's strict crypto regulations. Based on MAS's June 2025 requirements, businesses must meet several compliance criteria to operate legally in Singapore.

Key Requirements

  • Minimum capital: SGD 1 million
  • Singapore-based compliance officer (SGD 150k-250k/year)
  • Annual audit by MAS-approved firm
  • Travel Rule implementation (SGD 50k-200k)
  • Prohibited credit card payments for crypto
Compliance Cost Analysis
Required Costs
  • Minimum Capital: SGD 1,000,000
  • Compliance Officer Salary: SGD 150,000
  • Travel Rule Implementation: SGD 50,000
  • Annual Audit: SGD 30,000
Estimated Total
SGD 1,230,000
Key Insight: MAS requires a minimum of SGD 1 million in liquid assets, plus ongoing compliance costs that can exceed SGD 200,000 annually for many firms.
High Risk - Compliance costs may exceed your business revenue

When the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) announced in June 2025 that it would issue crypto licenses only in extremely limited circumstances, it wasn’t a tweak to the rules-it was a full shutdown of the door. For companies that thought Singapore was still a crypto-friendly hub, the message was clear: if you don’t have elite compliance systems, a Singapore-based officer, and a rock-solid reason to be here, you’re out.

Why MAS Changed Everything

Singapore used to be a magnet for crypto firms. Its reputation as a stable, well-regulated financial center made it a go-to for companies wanting to look legitimate while serving clients overseas. But MAS saw the problem: companies were using Singapore’s name as a badge of trust, then operating with minimal oversight elsewhere. That’s called regulatory arbitrage, and MAS decided it wouldn’t tolerate it anymore.

The Financial Services and Markets Act 2022 (FSMA) gave MAS the legal power to go after any Singapore-based company, no matter where its users were. If your server is in Singapore, your team is in Singapore, or you’re incorporated here-you’re under MAS’s thumb. Even if you only serve customers in Nigeria, Brazil, or Ukraine. That’s not common in global finance. Most regulators only care about who lives in their country. MAS cares about what your company does from Singapore, period.

The DTSP License: A Door That’s Almost Closed

To operate legally in Singapore, crypto firms must now hold a Digital Token Service Provider (DTSP) license. But here’s the catch: MAS says it will generally not issue a licence. That’s not a typo. It’s not a suggestion. It’s the official stance. Only firms with proven, world-class compliance infrastructure will even get a look.

The requirements aren’t light:

  • Minimum capital: At least SGD 1 million in liquid assets
  • Must hire a full-time, Singapore-based compliance officer (salaries range from SGD 150,000 to SGD 250,000 per year)
  • Annual independent audit by a MAS-approved firm
  • Full AML/CFT protocols-no exceptions
  • Cybersecurity standards matching those of major banks
And you have to prove you can do all this before June 30, 2025. No extensions. No grace period. No “we’re working on it.”

Travel Rule Enforcement: Tracking Every Transaction Over SGD 1,500

If you send or receive more than SGD 1,500 (about USD 1,100) in crypto, MAS requires you to collect and share:

  • Full name of sender and receiver
  • Identification number (passport, national ID)
  • Account or wallet address
This is the Travel Rule, enforced under Notice PSN02. It’s not optional. It’s not a suggestion. You need software that can automatically capture, store, and transmit this data to other platforms. Implementation costs? Between SGD 50,000 and SGD 200,000, depending on your volume. Small firms? Many can’t afford it. And if you’re serving users in countries where this data can’t be shared due to local laws? You’re stuck between two regulators.

Compliance officer monitoring global crypto transactions under strict MAS regulations in Singapore.

Consumer Protection: No Credit Cards, No Guesswork

MAS doesn’t just care about crime-it cares about people losing money. Since September 2024, all licensed platforms must:

  • Prohibit customers from buying crypto with credit cards
  • Conduct a suitability assessment before allowing trading
  • Clearly disclose all risks in plain language
This means no more “buy Bitcoin with your Amex” ads. No more pushy sales tactics. No more pretending crypto is a safe investment. Platforms must now prove they understand their users’ financial background and risk tolerance. That’s a huge shift from the wild west of crypto marketing.

Stablecoins Are Treated Like Cash

MAS doesn’t treat stablecoins like “crypto.” It treats them like digital cash. Since November 2023, any stablecoin issued or traded in Singapore must maintain “a high degree of value stability.” That means:

  • Reserves must be held in low-risk, liquid assets (cash, government bonds)
  • Regular audits of reserve holdings are mandatory
  • Issuers must disclose exactly what backs the token
No algorithmic stablecoins. No unbacked tokens. No “we’ll figure it out later.” If you can’t prove your stablecoin is as safe as a bank deposit, you can’t operate here.

Penalties Are Not a Warning-They’re a Death Sentence

Violate any of these rules? You’re looking at:

  • Fines up to SGD 200,000 (USD 147,000)
  • Imprisonment for individuals
  • Immediate shutdown of operations
There’s no “first offense” exception. No warning letter. No probation. One violation, and your license is gone. Your team is out. Your business is dead in Singapore.

Abandoned crypto server room with revoked license notices and a broken credit card in Singapore.

What’s Happening to the Industry?

The results are stark. Before the June 2025 deadline, around 200 firms had applied for or held provisional licenses. By July 2025, only 15-20 remained fully compliant, according to Blockdata’s analysis. That’s a 90% drop.

Crypto job postings in Singapore fell 37% in Q1 2025 compared to Q4 2024. Salaries for compliance officers skyrocketed. Firms that didn’t have the budget for a Singapore-based team packed up and moved to places like Dubai or Switzerland, where licensing is still active.

Even big players felt the pressure. Some international exchanges shut down their Singapore offices entirely. Others kept a skeleton crew just to handle compliance for local users-but stopped serving global clients from here.

Why This Matters Beyond Singapore

MAS isn’t just making rules for Singapore. It’s setting a global standard. Its approach is now the most stringent in the world. Other regulators are watching closely. If MAS can prove that strict oversight reduces crypto crime and protects financial integrity, more countries might follow.

But there’s a trade-off. By shutting the door to most new entrants, Singapore risks becoming irrelevant in the next wave of crypto innovation. DeFi, tokenized assets, and Web3 infrastructure are moving fast. If the best talent and technology can’t come here, Singapore’s financial hub status might become a museum piece-impressive, but not growing.

What’s Next?

MAS has signaled it’s working on new rules for DeFi protocols and stablecoin arrangements by late 2025. That means the rules aren’t done. But don’t expect relief. Expect more detail. More complexity. More cost.

The message is consistent: Singapore wants a tiny, ultra-clean crypto industry. Not a big, noisy one. Not a speculative one. Just a few firms that can prove they’re trustworthy, transparent, and tightly controlled.

If you’re a business trying to operate here, you need to ask yourself: Can we afford the compliance? Can we hire the officer? Can we afford the software? Can we live without serving global customers from Singapore?

If the answer is no-you’re not just out of luck. You’re out of the game.

Can I still operate a crypto business in Singapore if I don’t have a DTSP license?

No. Operating without a DTSP license after June 30, 2025 is illegal. MAS enforces this strictly, even against foreign companies that have a Singapore-based team, office, or incorporation. Penalties include fines up to SGD 200,000, imprisonment, and forced shutdowns. There are no exceptions or grace periods.

What’s the difference between MAS and other crypto regulators like the SEC or FCA?

Unlike the SEC or FCA, which focus on protecting local investors and regulating specific asset types, MAS applies its rules extraterritorially. If your company is based in Singapore-even if you serve only overseas clients-you’re fully under MAS control. Also, MAS has banned credit card crypto purchases and treats stablecoins like cash, which most other regulators don’t. Its licensing system is far more restrictive, with only a handful of approvals expected.

Do I need a Singapore-based compliance officer even if I’m a foreign company?

Yes. If your company is incorporated in Singapore, has a local office, or employs staff there, you must appoint a full-time Singapore-based compliance officer. This person must be qualified, independent, and directly accountable to MAS. Outsourcing this role or hiring remotely doesn’t meet MAS requirements. The officer must be physically present in Singapore and available for audits and inspections.

Can I still accept crypto payments in Singapore as a business?

Yes, but only if you’re not operating as a crypto exchange, custodian, or trading platform. Businesses that accept crypto as payment for goods or services don’t need a DTSP license-unless they’re holding or transferring crypto for others. If you’re just receiving crypto as payment and converting it to SGD immediately, you’re fine. But if you’re storing it, trading it, or offering it to customers as a service, you need a license.

Why did MAS move so quickly after announcing the rules?

MAS gave only four weeks between the final announcement and the June 30, 2025 deadline. The goal was to prevent firms from dragging out compliance or exploiting loopholes. MAS believes that a short, sharp deadline forces only serious, well-prepared companies to stay. Critics say it’s unfair to small firms, but MAS argues that regulatory integrity can’t wait for slow movers.

Are DeFi platforms regulated under MAS rules?

Not yet, but they’re coming. MAS has confirmed it’s developing specific rules for decentralized finance protocols, expected by late 2025. Currently, if a DeFi platform has a Singapore-based team, developer, or corporate entity, it may already be subject to existing DTSP rules. MAS is likely to target DeFi platforms that offer custody, trading, or lending services-even if they claim to be “decentralized.”

What happens to my crypto assets if my DTSP license is revoked?

If your license is revoked, MAS will require you to freeze customer assets and begin a controlled wind-down. You must notify all users and provide a clear path to withdraw their funds within a set timeframe. MAS may appoint a third-party custodian to oversee the process. Your assets won’t be seized, but you’ll lose control over them until the wind-down is complete. Failure to comply can lead to criminal charges.

15 Comments

  • Image placeholder

    Nidhi Gaur

    November 17, 2025 AT 08:03

    Man, I saw this coming after the whole Terra collapse. MAS is just tired of being the crypto laundry mat for sketchy ops. Honestly? I respect it. No more fake compliance shells.

  • Image placeholder

    Usnish Guha

    November 18, 2025 AT 20:03

    This is exactly what happens when you let amateurs play with fire. Singapore didn’t just tighten rules-they drew a line in the sand. If you can’t afford a $250k compliance officer, you never should’ve been in the game. This isn’t harsh-it’s necessary.

  • Image placeholder

    satish gedam

    November 19, 2025 AT 02:04

    Big picture: MAS is building a crypto ecosystem that actually lasts. 💪 Yes, it’s brutal for small players, but think of it like this-no more rug pulls from Singapore-based entities. That’s a win for everyone. The ones who survive? They’ll be the gold standard. Keep going, Singapore!

  • Image placeholder

    rahul saha

    November 19, 2025 AT 07:28

    It’s not about regulation-it’s about epistemological sovereignty. MAS is asserting that financial sovereignty must be anchored in ontological integrity. The algorithmic stablecoin? A metaphysical fraud. The Travel Rule? A necessary phenomenological constraint on liquidity. We’re witnessing the birth of crypto’s Kantian phase.

  • Image placeholder

    Marcia Birgen

    November 20, 2025 AT 08:55

    Love this approach. 🙌 No more shady crypto ads pushing credit card buys. No more pretending it’s ‘investing’ when it’s gambling with leverage. Singapore’s saying: if you’re gonna do this, do it right. I hope more countries follow. Real protection > hype.

  • Image placeholder

    Jerrad Kyle

    November 20, 2025 AT 19:18

    Let me tell you something-Singapore didn’t just change the rules, they rewrote the playbook. Think of it like a Michelin-star chef kicking out the food truck vendors because they’re using expired oil. Yeah, it’s cold. But now the kitchen’s clean. The ones who made it? They’re chefs, not con artists.

  • Image placeholder

    Usama Ahmad

    November 22, 2025 AT 17:16

    Honestly I’m surprised more didn’t leave. I know a guy who shut down his Singapore office and moved to Dubai. Said the compliance paperwork was eating his lunch. Still, I get it-better to be clean than crowded.

  • Image placeholder

    Nathan Ross

    November 23, 2025 AT 01:13

    The regulatory clarity here is unprecedented. The absence of ambiguity eliminates opportunistic behavior. Efficiency is maximized through deterministic enforcement. No gray zones. No loopholes. Just structure.

  • Image placeholder

    garrett goggin

    November 24, 2025 AT 03:43

    Oh please. MAS is just scared. They know crypto’s the future and they can’t control it, so they’re killing it with bureaucracy. This isn’t regulation-it’s a power grab by old men in suits who think blockchain is a virus. Next they’ll ban QR codes.

  • Image placeholder

    Bill Henry

    November 26, 2025 AT 00:26

    Wait so if I run a small shop and accept crypto for coffee I’m fine? That’s actually cool. I thought the whole thing was banned. Glad they made that clear. Also why is everyone so mad? If you can’t afford the rules maybe you weren’t ready

  • Image placeholder

    Jess Zafarris

    November 26, 2025 AT 21:45

    So let me get this straight-Singapore’s saying you can’t use a credit card to buy crypto, but you can still buy a Lamborghini with cash? The cognitive dissonance here is almost poetic. Also, who decided SGD 1,500 was the magic number? Did they roll a dice?

  • Image placeholder

    jesani amit

    November 27, 2025 AT 13:19

    Look, I’ve been in this space since 2017. I’ve seen startups burn through millions trying to ‘comply’ with half-baked rules. Singapore’s move is brutal, yeah-but it’s also the most honest thing any regulator’s done in years. The cost of entry is high, but now you know who’s serious. I’ve got a friend who got licensed last month. He spent $800k just on audits and software. He’s nervous but proud. That’s the kind of company you want running your exchange-not some guy with a Telegram group and a whitepaper.

  • Image placeholder

    Mike Gransky

    November 27, 2025 AT 15:55

    This is exactly why I moved my operations to Zurich. Singapore’s rules are impressive, but they’re not scalable for innovation. The talent is leaving. The startups are fleeing. This isn’t leadership-it’s museum curation.

  • Image placeholder

    nikhil .m445

    November 28, 2025 AT 18:42

    It is not possible to have a proper financial system without strict oversight. Anyone who disagrees is either naive or complicit. Singapore is the only country with the courage to act. Others are still debating. We should be proud.

  • Image placeholder

    Rick Mendoza

    November 30, 2025 AT 05:10

    They’re killing innovation with paperwork. You need a Singapore officer? Fine. But why not let remote ones? Why not let AI handle compliance? Why force everyone into a 1980s bank model? This isn’t regulation it’s nostalgia

Write a comment